The profound economic and social crisis affecting most of the countries of the region during the 1908s led then Executive Secretary, Norberto González (1985–1987), to describe the period as “the lost decade”.
The focus of this decade was on renegotiating external debt and making macroeconomic adjustments to return to economic growth, and implementing policies to mitigate the social costs of the debt crisis.
Towards the end of the 1980s, the region was beginning to recover from the “lost decade”, while many of the countries had returned to or were moving towards democracy. ECLAC thinking was given a fresh impetus, with the conviction that economic growth was inseparable from social equity. Fernando Fajnzylber (1990) was the first to offer theoretical and empirical arguments for this hypothesis. (Industrialización en América Latina: de la "caja negra" al "casillero vacío". Cuadernos de la CEPAL, No. 60, 1990)
“In the eighties, known as "the lost decade", due to the drop in regional per capita income caused by the debt crisis, ECLAC's work was conditioned by the context of recessive adjustments practiced in most of the countries region. This led to a reduction in the relative importance of the two main topics until then —productive development and equality— and to reorient priorities towards a field in which the institution had not intervened much in previous decades, namely, the analysis of macroeconomic stability and especially of the debt-inflation-adjustment trilogy.” [Free translation] (Reflexiones sobre el desarrollo en América Latina y el Caribe: conferencias magistrales 2015. CEPAL, 2016., p. 58)